SEC vs Ripple Lawsuit: How It Affects XRP Price and Future Valuation Debate

Posted on by Artificial Intelligence
Dimly lit courtroom scene, gavel slamming, hopeful XRP investors, subtle ripple effect in the background, muted color palette illustrating uncertainty, contrasting with streaks of gold for potential future valuation, emotions of financial tension and anticipation, digital currency despair vs sudden growth, 350-char limit.

The ongoing legal battle between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple has notably affected the price growth of XRP. While recent progress in the lawsuit has led to a modest price increase over the last 90 days, experts believe that the token’s fair market valuation remains significantly lower than it should be.

A research study conducted by Jimmy Vallee and Molly Elmore of Valhil Capital examined the fair market value of XRP after enduring a two-year-long U.S. SEC lawsuit. The resulting report estimated that XRP’s fair value ranges anywhere between $3.5K and $22K, a stark contrast to its current trading value. To assess the impact of the lawsuit on XRP’s price, Vallee and Elmore invited a group of individuals skilled in quantitative and financial evaluations to form a confidential committee tasked with building six different valuation models.

The comprehensive study incorporated several influential models such as the 99-Year Golden Eagle Model, Discounted Cash Flow Model, Pipeline Flow Model, Athey and Mitchnick Model, Collateralization Model, and Quantum Liquidity Model. Variables considered in the research included global transaction volume, discount rate, daily transaction value, token circulation, projected economic growth, and more. Ultimately, the six different models revealed a median fair market value for XRP at approximately $12,822, with a mean value of $61,231 per XRP.

Despite this, XRP currently trades at a mere average price of $0.52. Over the past 90 days, however, the price of XRP has surged by an impressive 42%, outperforming leading cryptocurrencies Bitcoin and Ethereum among the top 10 digital assets.

While the lawsuit’s outcome may potentially impact XRP’s future value, it is crucial to recognize the author’s personal opinions and varying market conditions that could influence the token’s price. Conducting thorough market research before investing in any cryptocurrencies remains essential, as neither the author nor the original publication holds responsibility for any personal financial losses.

Source: Coingape

Sponsored ad

More Articles

Depiction of a moody courtroom scene, under dimly lit marble arches, with an ethereal representation of HelbizCoin under spotlight. Use muted colors to evoke a sense of conflict and tension. In the background, a large scale symbolizes justice. Add a crowd of people symbolizing investors, showing both hope and apprehension, while observe a semi-transparent globe indicating the international elements of the case. Artistic style should lean towards classic courtroom illustration, with a surreal touch.

HelbizCoin Scandal: Unsettling the Crypto ‘Regulation-Free’ Ethos or Securing Investment?

The class-action lawsuit against the creators of HelbizCoin centers on fraudulent promises and price manipulation, adding complexity to cryptocurrency regulations as the coin is classified as a security under federal law. This case could broadly impact the relationship between national laws, international jurisdictions, and global networks, potentially leading to stricter regulations and reshaping the crypto-market.

Intricate political scene in South Korea, lawmakers debating cryptoasset holdings, warm evening light, Baroque style, heightened emotions, tension between public trust and privacy. Justice Ministry conducting bi-annual checks, allegations of corruption, global implications, quest for balance in blockchain-driven future.

Balancing Public Trust and Privacy: Cryptoasset Holdings of Lawmakers in South Korea Debated

South Korea’s Justice Ministry clarifies its stance on the cryptoasset holdings of public officials working with cryptocurrency regulations, assuring that bi-annual checks are conducted. Amidst controversies surrounding lawmakers owning cryptocurrencies, the debate over mandatory transparency versus private, personal information arises, with worldwide implications as the adoption of cryptocurrencies increases.