In a recent turn of events drawn from the annals of the blockchain universe, Alameda Research was observed transferring a staggering $4.1 billion worth of FTT tokens to FTX exchange, a move that occurred shortly before FTX declared bankruptcy. The collapse of FTX, as widely speculated, was triggered by alarming reports that indicated a hefty 40 percent of Alameda’s $14.6 billion assets were held in FTT tokens in September 2022.
Incidentally, blockchain analytics firm Nansen, in an exclusive report to Cointelegraph, noticed some dubious on-chain activities between the two organizations prior to these revelations. As observed from this report, between September 28 and November 1, besides the significant FTT tokens, Alameda had been consistently transferring a mix of US dollar stablecoins amounting to $388 million to FTX.
Furthermore, the findings also indicated that FTX retained around 280 million FTT (80%) of the total 350 million FTT supply. Bizarrely, data reflects substantial proportions of FTT trading volumes amounting to billions flowing between differing FTX and Alameda wallets. This holds pertinent implications – as per Nansen, this domineering control over FTT token supply facilitated the two organizations to bolster each other’s balance sheets.
In another intriguing development, amidst the financial catastrophe of 3 Arrows Capital in mid-June 2022, Alameda was found to have transferred ~163m of FTT to FTX wallets, worth ~$4 billion at that time. Can this imply a covert, massive FTT-backed loan from FTX to Alameda? On-chain data summons a strong possibility.
The absence of clear regulatory standards in the crypto market played a significant role in this fiasco. On one hand, lack of regulations provides companies the freedom to innovate and create solutions catering to their consumers’ needs. However, the same lack of oversight also led to questionable financial transactions that might have catalyzed FTX’s unfortunate collapse.
FTX’s fall spotlighted the interconnectedness within blockchain networks, thereby reinforcing the necessity of transparent, comprehensive, and real-time financial disclosure. This incident serves as an example for policymakers to foster a regulatory environment conducive to sustainable growth in this new-age market, therefore ensuring investor protection and fraudulent prevention.
Source: Cointelegraph
