Tether’s Discontinuation of Omni and Other Platforms: A Bold Move or High Risk?

Posted on by Artificial Intelligence
A dimly lit scene in a noir art style. A large coin rendered as Tether stablecoin stands tall amidst a less detailed crowd of smaller coins, representing Omni, Kusama, and Bitcoin Cash, hint of dissolution in their form. The ambient mood is one of suspense, uncertainty, and change, with the focus on the Tether's bold stance in the foreground. The ghostly blockchain structures in the backdrop, fading away in mist.

Recent news from stablecoin issuer Tether, as published on Coindesk, has created quite a stir in the crypto community. Tether, which has been operating using Omni, a Bitcoin layer, for its USDT transfers since 2014 announced that it will discontinue support for Omni, along with Kusama (KSM) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) SLP implementations. Omni, essentially a software layer built on the Bitcoin blockchain, was designed to enhance the features of Bitcoin by providing smart contract capabilities.

There has been an underlying issue with the use of Omni. Despite its technological advancements, Omni has faced a dwindling interest over the years. The primary reason appears to be the lack of popular tokens and the availability of USDT on other blockchains. This availability led a majority of exchanges to lean towards alternative transport layers, leading to a drop in USDT usage on Bitcoin using the Omni layer.

Tether boasts a significant hold on the market as the largest stablecoin with a market cap of $82 billion and tokens issued on the Omni layer amount to $240 million worth. Kusama and Bitcoin Cash implementations hold $1.4 million and $980,000 respectively. The decision to pull the plug on these layers signifies a change in strategy by Tether.

From August 17, the issuance of USDT on Omni, Kusama, and Bitcoin Cash will cease. However, redemptions will continue for the next 12 months. Despite all these transitions, it’s noteworthy that the price of Tether has seen only a minor slump of 0.12% over the past 24 hours and continues to trade at around $0.998.

This decisive departure from established layers puts forth a major question about the future of Tether and its implications for the users. While some view this as an optimistic step towards embracing newer technologies, others see it as a risky move. As Tether navigates through these strategic decisions, the crypto world watches on, eager to witness the unfolding scenario in the unpredictable world of cryptocurrencies.

Source: Coindesk

Sponsored ad

More Articles

An abstract financial kingdom in twilight hues, glowing ledger books echoing tokens' transition and a looming treasury vault brimming with wealth. Reflect an undercurrent of action, suspense: Unclaimed tokens about to live forever under lock waiting for their destiny. Showcase an impending turn of events, a vibrant community voting under a celestial blockchain. Represent interaction and engagement as luminescent pathways arcing across the scene.

Unclaimed Tokens and a $59 Million Windfall: Arbitrum’s Unpredicted Odyssey

The Arbitrum Foundation recently transferred 69 million unclaimed ARB tokens to its treasury, amounting to $59 million and boosting it to nearly $3 billion in governance tokens. This successful move was through a vote proposed by a community member, demonstrating the impact of community engagement and decentralized operations. Meanwhile, Arbitrum’s user activity is growing along with efforts to expand the NFT space on its network.

Futuristic cityscape reflecting Worldcoin's ambition, bathed in the cool blue hue of technology yet shrouded in the dramatic shadows of privacy concerns. Conceptual biometric data swirling around, imitating a new dawn of digital identity, highlighted with the cautious optimism of a sunrise. The mood is tense, the atmosphere veering between breakthrough and apprehension.

Worldcoin: Decentralizing Digital Identity or Invading Privacy?

“Worldcoin, despite controversies, showcases a potentially groundbreaking use of blockchain: creating an immutable, biometrically authenticated digital identity. While the project faces both ethical dilemmas and security concerns, its potential in revolutionizing finance, political systems, and social structures cannot be overlooked. A critical question remains: trusting a private entity with our digital identities.”